Part 26 · Chapter 2
The WARN Act and State Mini-WARN Laws
Scope and status
This chapter covers the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (29 U.S.C. §§2101–2109; 20 C.F.R. Part 639) — coverage, the two triggering events, employment loss, the single site of employment question and its unresolved application to fully remote workers, notice content and delivery, the three exceptions, the sale-of-business and 90-day aggregation rules, and the liability and remedy structure — together with the state mini-WARN overlay and how WARN pay interacts with severance and releases. WARN is an employment-law statute, not an ERISA statute; the Firm's role here is the benefits-and-severance interface, and employment counsel should own the notice determination itself. Related questions are treated elsewhere: severance plan status and design in Severance Plan Status, Window Programs, and Design; §409A and taxation of WARN and severance payments in Severance under §409A and §457, and Severance Taxation; and the benefit-plan consequences of the layoff in Workforce Restructuring: Benefit Plan Consequences.
Sections
Part A — Coverage
A1.Who is a covered employer
Part 26, ch. 2, § A1
WARN applies to a business enterprise that employs either 100 or more employees, excluding part-time employees, or 100 or more employees who in the aggregate work at least 4,000 hours per week, exclusive of overtime. Statute: 29 U.S.C. §2101(a)(1); Final reg: 20 C.F.R. §639.3(a). A part-time employee is one employed for an average of fewer than 20 hours per week or who has been employed for fewer than 6 of the 12 months preceding the date on which notice is required. Statute: 29 U.S.C. §2101(a)(8). Workers on temporary layoff with a reasonable expectation of recall are counted, and employees who are themselves exempt from notice still count toward coverage. Final reg: 20 C.F.R. §639.3(a).
A2.Related entities
Part 26, ch. 2, § A2
Whether separate corporate entities are treated as a single employer is determined on a functional test drawn from the DOL regulation — common ownership, common directors and officers, de facto exercise of control, unity of personnel policies emanating from a common source, and dependency of operations. Final reg: 20 C.F.R. §639.3(a)(2).
Part B — The Two Triggering Events
- B1Plant closingSubscribers
- B2Mass layoffSubscribers
- B3Employment lossSubscribers
- B4Transfers that are not employment lossesSubscribers
Part C — Single Site of Employment (Including Remote Workers)
- C1The regulationSubscribers
- C2Fully remote employees — unsettled, and the most important open question in current WARN practiceSubscribers
Part D — Notice
- D1Timing and recipientsSubscribers
- D2Content and deliverySubscribers
Part E — The Three Exceptions
- E1Faltering company — plant closings onlySubscribers
- E2Unforeseeable business circumstancesSubscribers
- E3Natural disasterSubscribers
- E4What every exception still requiresSubscribers
Part F — Aggregation and Sale of a Business
- F1The 90-day aggregation ruleSubscribers
- F2Sale of a businessSubscribers
Part G — Liability and Remedies
- G1What the employer owes employeesSubscribers
- G2OffsetsSubscribers
- G3The civil penalty and enforcementSubscribers
- G4No injunction, and remedies are exclusiveSubscribers
Part H — State Mini-WARN Laws
- H1The overlay, and why it usually governsSubscribers
- H2The three that most often controlSubscribers
- H3Arizona has no mini-WARNSubscribers
- H4Pending federal change — a live watch itemSubscribers
- H5Recent enactments — Washington, Ohio, and NebraskaSubscribers
Part I — WARN, Severance, and Releases Together
- I1Whether severance offsets WARN liabilitySubscribers
- I2Pay in lieu of noticeSubscribers
- I3Releasing WARN claimsSubscribers